Wednesday, 22 February 2012

Irish Internet Service Providers accused of hypocrisy

Irish internet providers have said that a move by their counterparts in the UK to make it harder for children to access internet porn is akin to “censorship.”

Their stance has been condemned by politicians and campaigners as “scandalous” and “hypocritical.”

The UK scheme, introduced last year after recommendations by a Government-backed report, means that when a parent sets up on the internet they have to indicate that they want to be able to access porn sites.

In Ireland, you do the opposite, that is, you have to indicate that you do not want to be able to access porn sites.

The Internet Service Providers Association of Ireland (ISPAI) has dismissed the UK approach as “censorship,” saying the responsibility should lie with parents to regulate what children access on the web.  Minister for Children, Frances Fitzgerald, refused to say whether the Government was planning to move towards the UK approach.

However, the ISPAI stance was attacked by two Senators, Jillian van Turnhout and Ronan Mullen, who accused the internet providers of hypocrisy over their stance.  Senator van Turnhout, a children’s rights campaigner said the response of Irish internet providers to the move by their UK counterparts was “a great shame.”

“The Internet service providers of Ireland are more than willing to block access to sites that infringe copyright, but they consider it to be nothing less than censorship to try to prevent a child from accessing potentially harmful material.

“They took a similar view when they were asked to block child abuse material.  This is already being done in many European countries, including Norway, Sweden and Italy.”

She noted that the US National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children has estimated that 20 per cent of all pornography on the Internet depicts the abuse and exploitation of children.

“However, Irish Internet providers are more concerned with preventing people from downloading songs and other things from the entertainment industry than with blocking terrible images of children being abused,” Senator van Turnhout added.

Senator Ronan Mullen said the decision of the Irish providers to criticise the action of their UK counterparts seemed quite scandalous.  He said that the willingness of internet providers “to see access blocked when it comes to infringement of copyright, yet they do not seem to have a sense of the wider public interest and the protection of the most vulnerable children in society” is hypocritical.

He added that the unwillingness of the Minister for Children, Frances Fitzgerald, to even comment on whether there were plans to persuade Irish providers to adopt the British model is disappointing.

“Why do we lack courage when it comes to trying to shape the media and the internet environment so as to protect children from accessing unacceptable material,” he asked.  He expressed the hope that the Government would take a more courageous approach.

Speaking on Monday at the launch of Safer Internet Day 2012 at St Brigid’s Primary School in Dublin, Ms Fitzgerald admitted that the UK was “further ahead” in terms of protecting children from inappropriate online material, but she refused to comment on whether there were any plans to persuade Irish internet providers to adopt the British model.

The event aims to promote safer internet use for children, and marked a new Garda Primary Schools Programme module dealing with online bullying.


Comment:   Why the delay  and hesitation by the Irish Government? Maybe because there is no ownership or involvement of Catholic Church in ISPs so no stick with which to beat the Church? The Irish Government is guilty of Hypocrisy in this matter despite its professed concern for children.




A Blessed Lenten journey to all readers, and their families and friends.

   I shall not be blogging  every day during this holy season, though I shall pray daily for you on your journey, and hope you will pray for me on mine.


The following thought may be helpful:  Penance is not an optional extra, but is necessary for Salvation. So choose wisely!




 Addendum to yesterday's post:
YOU CAN SIGN A PETITION IN RESPECT OF MARRIAGE ON THE


 WEBSITE OF COALITION FOR MARRIAGE.  Just CLICK BELOW

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Anonymous Comments will not normally be published.. Those who have no profile may de declined