When will C of E bishops stop arsing about?

Why do I bother, even to ask that question, I ask myself, and indeed anybody else who might be inclined to pay any attention to anything that a a C of E bishop might say?

Sadly because they seldom open their mouths without covering society with mental diarrhoea. They prevaricate and waffle. A recent example is the Archbishop of York's statement that those Anglicans who join the Catholic Church under the new Apostolic Constitution wont be real Catholics! As if a Protestant Archbshop could decide who will and wont be Catholic!

Yet another example is the report produced by the Revision Committee set up by the C Of E Synod in respect of women bishops and pastoral care ( they wont get any!) for those who cannot accept them, i.e. chiefly Anglo-Catholics, so called. For the full report, due to given today by the Bishop of Manchester to Synod. go to Ruth Gledhill in the Times or Damian Thompson in The Telegraph.

A third example is the news that some C of E Bishops want to postpone a decision in respect of recognising those Christians in North America who reject "gay" bishops . and vicars who openly flout traditional Christian teaching. Some C of E bishops have tabled a proposal that Synod postpone recognising the breakaway groups in America. Would that be because the breakaway groups are more Christian than the C of E ?

The fourth and almost laughable example is what the Archbishop of Canterbury says in his foreword to a book of essays to be published next week. the Archbishop states that loss of faith in politicians is damaging Britain!
Nothing about the damage done by the loss of faith in bishops who seem to have lost faith in God, or who regard God's Word as a regrettable inconvenience to be smoothed over, or should that be smothered?, by garrulous reports produced by ad hoc committees. Setting up Committees means that the C of E bishops can avoid taking decisions. Heaven forbid that a C of E bishop should have to take a decision for truth instead of following and pandering to the lowest form of popular "culture". But that's the C of E for you. It was founded to favour the sexual proclivities of Henry VIII,and thereby struck a blow, against Marriage, and society, and has never departed from sanctioning aberrant sexual proclivities, or indeed sanctioning anything that continues to strike against Marriage. But then...it is being true to the purpose for which it was founded. And they talk about damaging society!

Pass me the sick bag, please.